高级检索
徐兵, 赵号, 曹艳楠, 李学斌. 综合能源系统配置方案综合评价研究[J]. 农村电气化, 2024, (3): 27-34. DOI: 10.13882/j.cnki.ncdqh.2024.03.008
引用本文: 徐兵, 赵号, 曹艳楠, 李学斌. 综合能源系统配置方案综合评价研究[J]. 农村电气化, 2024, (3): 27-34. DOI: 10.13882/j.cnki.ncdqh.2024.03.008
XU Bing, ZHAO Hao, CAO Yannan, LI Xuebin. Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Integrated Energy System Configuration Scheme[J]. RURAL ELECTRIFICATION, 2024, (3): 27-34. DOI: 10.13882/j.cnki.ncdqh.2024.03.008
Citation: XU Bing, ZHAO Hao, CAO Yannan, LI Xuebin. Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Integrated Energy System Configuration Scheme[J]. RURAL ELECTRIFICATION, 2024, (3): 27-34. DOI: 10.13882/j.cnki.ncdqh.2024.03.008

综合能源系统配置方案综合评价研究

Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Integrated Energy System Configuration Scheme

  • 摘要: 针对综合能源系统配置方案评价问题,文章提出一种基于层次分析法-熵值法主客观结合的权重系数法的评价方法。首先,综合考虑电网、热(冷)网、天然气网,建立综合能源系统配置方案多维度综合效益评价指标体系;其次,提出层次分析法-熵值法主客观结合的权重系数确定最优权重;最后,采用模糊综合评价法进行评价,给出配置方案评分结果。文章采用我国内蒙古地区某个综合能源系统作为对象进行案例分析,验证本文所提方法的有效性。

     

    Abstract: Aiming at the evaluation of integrated energy system configuration schemes, this paper proposes an evaluation method based on the weight coefficient method, which combines the subjective and objective methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Entropy Value. Firstly, considering the power grid, heating (cooling) network, and natural gas network comprehensively, the paper establishes a multi-dimensional comprehensive benefit evaluation index system for the comprehensive energy system configuration plan. Secondly, a weight coefficient combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Entropy Method is proposed to determine the optimal weight. Finally, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used for evaluation, and the scoring results of the configuration plan are given. A comprehensive energy system in Inner Mongolia is analyzed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

     

/

返回文章
返回